# of watchers: 11
2004-11-18 [BRONZED]: DOWN WITH CENSORSHIP!!!!
2004-11-18 [Solitiaum]: Damn straight.
2004-11-18 [BRONZED]: Censorship will get us in the end
2004-11-18 [Solitiaum]: Its Big Brother, I tell you!!
2004-11-18 [Big sexy Dan]: Freedom o' speech i say!!--arr matey!!
2004-11-18 [Solitiaum]: Hehehe...
2004-11-18 [Draconius]: NO MORE CENSORSHIP, NO MORE CENSORSHIP!!!!
2004-11-18 [BRONZED]: YEA!!! ROCK ON!!!!
2004-11-25 [Hependipherous]: I'm against censorship in all it's forms. I'm not even sure that American parents today are capable of deciding what their own children can and cannot see. Not to mention that When a fascist government takes control the first thing they do is control the media. They seek to "censor" all information and make sure the people only hear supportive propaganda. I say we have a right to the freedom of information and freedom of speach. DOWN WITH CENSORSHIP!
2004-11-25 [Sunrose]: Hmm I agree, but this wiki is made based on a specific example I have a problem with: Elfwood is Thomas' site and if he doesn't want adult material that's his choice. There are other places to go. It's not like he's telling people they are not allowed to make adult material at all: he just doesn't want that on his site. If I make something and I decide about the rules, does that mean I am censoring others? I think the notion means a lot more than just that.
2004-11-25 [Uncomfortably Numb]: Fuck Censorship !!!!!
2004-11-25 [Sunrose]: oh yes, intelligent answer ^^
2004-11-26 [Solitiaum]: Lol, Sunrose... And for the record, I respect that you have your own views on the subject, these just happen to be mine...
2004-11-26 [Hependipherous]: If this is simply against Thomas' decision to dissallow adult material on EW then no, I don't support that at all. His site, his work, etc... That's not censorship. He allows a lot more in than if somone from a more conservative nation would. I think he's pretty lax. Although there are some issues with the penis. I have a friend who has had images rejected on the simple basis that it was a male nude with an average sized penis. It was a minitaur anyway... you'de think bovine growth hormones would have a say in his... development. But that's the mods... not really Thomas. *shrugs*
2004-11-26 [Hependipherous]: I also think he's a little strict on what cannot be said in writing. A rating system would be nice. You can put ratings on HTML documents that would aid parental controlls. *shrugs* I also don't think swearing is that big of a deal. *shrugs*
2004-11-26 [Sunrose]: But that is all his choice, it doesn't make it censorship. And since this example seems to be the reason for the wiki, I am not signing. I am against censorship though.
2004-11-26 [Hependipherous]: Yep, generally speaking all my dealings with Mods/Thomas have been pleasant. I'm wondering what kind of images Serendipity was trying to upload. If it was a while ago then the rules have been refined and aren't nearly so bad now. Pre-merger the whole high fantasy/scifi bull crap was getting pretty heineous.
2004-11-26 [Solitiaum]: No, this simply isnt just anti thomas... This is BECAUSE of my experience with Thomas, against censorship ingeneral. If that isnt clear, then I will re wrtite my entrance.
2004-11-26 [Hependipherous]: After re-reading it, it appears to be a petition to get Thomas to rethink his rules. If that's not what this is about, it should definatley be clarified.